1. The Defendant’s KRW 3.7 million and the Plaintiff’s 5% per annum from March 27, 2014 to December 12, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is the president of the council of occupants' representatives of the Busan Northern-gu, and the defendant served as the auditor of the above apartment.

B. The Defendant: (a) around August 201, in the election of the representative of the Dong and the president that was implemented in the above apartment around August 201; and (b) on March 15, 2012, the matters such as the qualification of the candidate, expenses, etc. were lawfully determined and executed in accordance with the apartment management rules and the resolution of the election commission; (c) on March 15, 2012, the Defendant withdrawn and used KRW 3,776,720 for the election expenses in collusion with the chairman of the election management commission without obtaining approval of the council of occupants’ representatives.

2. At the time of the special election of the president, the public relations posters should be produced and distributed as individual money, and A unfairly withdrawn management expenses and used them for the production of their posters;

3. A, in collusion with the chairman of the election management committee, has operated the qualification of candidate for the chairman in order to make the candidate shot.

‘The '' sets up the leaflet prepared with the content at the entrance of each household, thereby impairing the Plaintiff’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts.

C. In addition, on March 21, 2012, the defendant was above the above apartment.

The purpose of the article, such as the paragraph, was to attach it to the apartment elevator with tape, and to damage the plaintiff's honor by openly pointing out false facts.

The defendant on June 27, 2013

C. The above fine of KRW 3 million was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million for the facts constituting the crime as stated in the preceding paragraph (Dasan District Court Decision 2012Da3383), and the appeal was dismissed (Dasan District Court Decision 2013No2231) but the said fine became final and conclusive around that time.

E. On the other hand, on December 15, 201, the Defendant confined the Plaintiff, etc. in the office of the Women’s Association in order to prevent them from going out of the said office.

The defendant was ordered to suspend indictment on May 14, 2012 upon the plaintiff's complaint.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, and 2.