logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2013.08.08 2013고정215
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On August 16, 2012, the Defendant: (a) connected the Internet site “B” at a place not lower than a police officer; (b) posted a false statement on the bulletin board that he/she sold Not North Korea under the title “Korea-computer C”; and (c) sent a defective amount of KRW 950,000 to the victim D to purchase Not North Korea on August 16, 2012, the Defendant concluded that he/she would send Not North Korea.

However, the defendant did not intend to sell the above North Korea.

On August 16, 2012, the Defendant received 950,000 won from the victim D to the post office account (E) account under the name of the Defendant, under the name of the Defendant.

B. On September 18, 2012, the Defendant posted a false letter stating that “LG Nowon North Korea” would be sold on the Internet site “B” through the said method at the place where a police officer was not a police officer, and that the Defendant would send Nowon-gu if the victim F would purchase Nowon-gu on September 18, 2012, sent KRW 255,00.

However, the defendant did not intend to sell the above North Korea.

On September 18, 2012, the Defendant received 255,000 won from the victim under the pretext of the trade union North Korea’s payment from the said post office account.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victims.

2. Around 13:10 on December 17, 2012, the Defendant: (a) 517 of H Hospital Hospital G located in Haju City-si, the Defendant expressed a bath to the victim I (the victim 23 years of age) by telephone; (b) found the victim in the sick room; and (c) resisted the victim; and (d) made the breath’s breath’s breath; and (b) used the breath’s breath on one occasion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Full or partial statement of each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of the police officer regarding I;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, which provide corresponding legal provisions to the facts of crime and select of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Detention at a workhouse;

arrow