logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.10.20 2017고단1558
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 9, 2017, at around 23:55, the Defendant who interferes with his/her duties lost “Handphones” to employees without any justifiable reason while drinking alcohol at the main points operated by the victim D in Jeju-si.

The victim's main business was obstructed by force, such as avoiding the disturbance between about 15 minutes, by taking the large interest of 15 minutes of the mobile phone, she brought about a mobile phone, brought about a mobile phone, opened, reported to the police, and she will report to the police."

2. On March 10, 2017, around 00:19, the Defendant demanded the police to report disturbance on the ground that there was no portable phone at the main points indicated in paragraph 1 of the same Article, and demanded the Defendant to report disturbance to the police. On the other hand, the Defendant discovered a telephone carried phone in the Defendant’s Australia’s family money while the Defendant confirmed the reported content by the police officer of the Dong-dong Police Station E Unit of the Dong-dong Police Station called out after receiving an employee’s 112 report.

Since then, the above main shop proprietor requested F to urge F to go back to the outside of the Defendant, and the Defendant asked F to go back from F, but he was refused to go back from F, while he was refusing to go back to F on the front of the above main shop.

Madchch fluor, bomb, fluor,

The age limit is one of the nationals of the Republic of Korea.

C. I would like to die and thrown away by flachie.

“At the same time,” etc., assaulted the right side of F with the hand floor at one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the control of crimes and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing duties) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Protection observation;

arrow