logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.06.23 2017고단198
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 8, 2016, from around 19:15 to from around 19:45 on the same day, the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance between approximately 30 minutes, such as cutting off the side while receiving a demand from the victim D, who is an employee after drinking, and cutting off the side, and cutting down the side while making a demand from the victim D, by ordering “C” entertainment stations equivalent to KRW 2,30,000 from the entertainment stations located in Jeju City from around 19:15 to around 19:45 the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main management by force.

2. On November 8, 2016, at the place indicated in paragraph (1) around 19:45 on November 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) recommended the Defendant to return home and to present his/her identification card; (b) “Pests are all infinites who are not well aware of the law; and (c) is offfinites who are infinites who are infinite, and are infinite, democratic police.”

When taking a bath, such as “A citizen of LA,” “I do not have an identification card,” and “I am to walk a slope F’s left mouth at one time and walk, and to pushed the chest with a hand, while I am going to walk.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officials on criminal investigation, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the statutes on photographic data of victims;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties), and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of interference with official business and the degree of interference with the execution of official business, the defendant agreed with the owner of the main place where the obstruction of official business is located, and the same crime.

arrow