Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ joint crime committed against the Defendants, from around 23:5 on December 31, 2015 to around 00:05 on the ground that they did not agree with each other on the “E” main point at which the victim D works in Jeju City from around 23:5 to around 00:05 on the following day, Defendant B was laid down on the floor of the so-called so-called “h, h, humb,” and laid down the so-called so-called so-called hump on the floor, and laid down the so-called hump on the floor of the so-called hump, humbabababa, and humbabababab. The Defendant A reported to the police by the victim on the ground that the victim reported the police.

"Prisoning so as to avoid disturbance," and caused customers who had drinking alcohol at the main point to throw away from the facility.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with and enforced to interfere with the victim's main business.

2. On January 1, 2016, the Defendant refused a request to present an identification card from a policeman belonging to the G police station located in the Dong-dong Police Station in Jeju, which was called out after receiving a report set forth in paragraph 1 on the F on the front of the Jeju-si, at around 00:22, Defendant A used his cell phone to gather his own cell phone on the floor, and assaulted H one time by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and subparagraph A of the option of punishment for the crime: Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act, and Article 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, and Article 314(1) and Article 314(2) of the Criminal Act, and Article 314

1. A aggravated criminal defendant: the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant A interferes with the business of the victim A.