The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed, and the case shall be remanded to the Cheongju District Court.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The court below held that the defendant violated the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products by falsely stating that the country of origin of cattle, pigs, scrapers, dissolved goods, and live-on ships is different from the fact in the course of operating the restaurant of this case, and thereby deceiving customers as if they were domestic food materials and domestic clifs, and thereby deceiving customers as if they were domestic clifs and domestic clifs.

The judgment of the court of first instance that convicted all of the facts charged of this case was affirmed.

In order to establish fraud, there must be relations between deception, mistake, and disposal of property. From this perspective, it is necessary to examine whether the court below found the guilty of fraud among the facts charged in the instant case.

According to the records, the defendant used a domestic part of 20,00 foot scam 20,000 foot scam meal or 25,000 through 55,000 foot scam scams scamscams, and the size of a domestic part of the Korean part used at the instant restaurant is 25 to 30 cm with a size of 1 to 5,000 to 7,000 won per 1mari, and the domestic part of the same size is above 20,000 won per 1mari, and the domestic part of camscams camscams, pigs, pigs, swine, dissolved, and scams provided at the instant restaurant, indicated by the defendant as a domestic part of which is a food material.

In such factual relations, whether the defendant's "this value is high and high, or not."

“In addition to the Defendant’s statement that, upon being asked, the Korean fatheries were processed in the Yong-gun of Yong-gun, Nam-gun, Nam-gun’s legal branch, the customer used the instant restaurant by falling under the indication of origin, i.e., the Korean origin indicated in the Me New Market.