1. The defendant stated each amount of money as stated in the separate sheet of compensation for losses to the plaintiffs, and as to this, from September 2, 2017 to September 2, 2018.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Business name: Private investment project - Project implementer: Seoul Regional Construction and Management Administration- Project approval under the defendant: Public notice I of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on August 7, 2015;

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on March 9, 2017 - Subject to expropriation: ① 10,680 square meters of K forest in Gyeyang-gu J (hereinafter “J”) in Goyang-si (hereinafter “J”), ② 511 square meters of L forest, ③ 493 square meters of M forest land (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”) are co-owners of each of the Plaintiffs’ co-ownership shares ( Plaintiffs B, C, C, 874, 615/5, 97, 97, 360 shares, Plaintiff D, F, 124,99,45/5, 97, 97, 360 shares, Plaintiff A1,249,450/5, 97, 360 shares, Plaintiff E874,615/5, 97, 360 shares, Plaintiff G 749, 670/59, 97, 360 shares, and compensation for expropriation - The pertinent portion of the subject of expropriation.

- Commencement date of expropriation: May 2, 2017

The Central Land Tribunal's ruling on an objection made on May 25, 2017 - Compensation for an objection made: The same shall apply to the corresponding part in the attached Form of compensation for losses.

- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation and a large appraisal corporation and a large-scale appraisal corporation;

D. The court appraiser at the court appraiser N’s appraisal result (hereinafter the above appraiser “court appraiser,” and the above appraiser at the court appraisal “court appraisal”) selected the area of 49,785 square meters (special-purpose area: development-restricted zone, natural green belt, utilization status: natural forest, road traffic: vertical length (Ga), shape land: 3,500 square meters: 33,50 square meters: 20 square meters) as a comparative standard, and then adjusted the time and compared the regional factors and individual factors with each of the instant land. The appraisal value of the instant subject matter was calculated by correcting other factors based on the compensation precedents on 856 square meters of high-si Pland.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 5, 9, Eul evidence 1 to 4 (including, if any, branch numbers), the result of the court appraisal, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion.