1. The Defendants shall be jointly and severally liable:

A. From May 20, 2015 to September 6, 2017, Plaintiff A’s KRW 37,811,150 and its amount.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Name of business, such as project approval and public notice: The name of the business: The Defendants, who are publicly notified by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy on August 13, 2012, and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy on September 3, 2013:

B. Plaintiff A- - 1,316 square meters of forest land in Pyeongtaek-si (hereinafter “instant land”) - Plaintiff B- 1,415 square meters of forest land in Pyeongtaek-si (hereinafter “instant two land”) - Plaintiff B- 1,415 square meters of Plaintiff B’s share in Pyeongtaek-si JJ 312 square meters of land in the instant three land (hereinafter “instant three land”). Plaintiff C- Plaintiff C- Plaintiff C- 660/1,415 of shares in Plaintiff C among the instant three land.

C. Compensation for losses for expropriation ruling rendered on March 26, 2015 by the Central Land Tribunal: The same shall apply to the column for “adjudication on expropriation” in the attached Table.

The date of commencement of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on May 19, 2015: An appraisal corporation, but an appraisal corporation, a general appraisal corporation.

(d) The above ruling by the Central Land Tribunal on December 17, 2015;

C. In addition to the written acceptance ruling, "the instant ruling" is deemed to be "the instant ruling."

- Plaintiff A: The amount of compensation for losses is as indicated in the attached Table “A” column - The amount of compensation for losses - The amount of compensation for losses - The amount of compensation for losses - The amount of compensation for losses - The amount of compensation for losses - the appraisal corporation

C. In addition to the appraisal corporation mentioned above, the appraisal corporation shall be referred to as "adjudgment appraiser" and the result of appraisal shall be referred to as "adjudication appraisal".

A person shall be appointed.

E. The appraiser K of this Court's entrustment of appraisal and the entrustment of complementary appraisal (the premise that part of the land of this case 1 and 3 was lawfully altered, hereinafter the above appraiser is referred to as "court appraiser", and the result of the appraisal is referred to as "court appraisal"): The land of this case 1 and 3 are as shown in the annexed "court supplementary appraisal" column.

Land 2 and 4 of this case: The “court appraisal” column in the attached Form is as stated.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3, 5, 6, Gap evidence 2-1 through 3, Eul evidence 4-1 to 4-1, 2, Eul evidence 5-1, and 2, Eul evidence 5-1, and 5-2, the result of this court's commission of appraisal and the result of supplemental appraisal commission to Eul. The whole pleadings are presented.