logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.09.07 2016고단1197
자동차관리법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 2, 2016, the Defendant embezzled the lost possession without taking necessary procedures, such as acquiring the vehicle number plate (C) owned by the victim B at the entrance of the 24,000 would be proportional to the patrolman, and returning it to the victim.

2. On March 2016, the Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act, illegally used air defense, and illegally used air defense events: (a) in the 103 underground parking lots of Da apartment 103 Damyang-si, Police Officer, the Defendant illegally used air defense by attaching the front number plate to the front front of the Defendant’s car (E) holding in arrears with the purpose of exercising the vehicle number plate (C) acquired as above; and (b) as seen above, the Defendant used the said car with the C number plate from around that time to June 8, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of a motor vehicle registration certificate, photographs related to unlawful events of air defense and detailed data on stolen and stolen vehicles;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the management subject to loss report, perusal of each motor vehicle register, number keeping;

1. Article 78 subparagraph 2 of the relevant Act, Article 71 (1) of the Automobile Management Act, Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 238 (2) and Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Consideration of the fact that the defendant for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act recognizes the crime and reflects the crime, and that there is no record of the punishment heavier than the suspended sentence;

arrow