logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2014.09.03 2014가단15226
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the 612 representative of the F apartment in Kimpo-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”), and Defendant B served as the head of the instant apartment management office until September 2012. Defendant D was the council of occupants’ representatives held on September 26, 2012 as the representative of the instant apartment (hereinafter “the council of occupants’ representatives”), and Defendant E is the staff of the instant apartment management office.

B. On September 26, 2012, the instant apartment complex was held by the council of occupants’ representatives to verify the bidding documents for the selection of cleaning companies and guard companies. During the meeting, the instant council of occupants’ representatives was voluntarily proposed to dismiss the Defendant B, who is the managing director, and the Plaintiff filed a complaint from the Defendant B on the ground that he/she was in the process of prosecution investigation due to criminal facts, such as the receipt of money and valuables, but he/she was found not guilty in the Incheon District Court Branch Decision 2012Kadan2090, and the said judgment became final and conclusive as dismissed.

C. The summary of the facts charged in the corresponding part of the criminal case for which innocence has become final and conclusive is as follows:

The defendant (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") is the representative of the 612 Dong unit of the F apartment in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and the victim B was working as the head of the above apartment management office.

The Defendant did not have been investigated by the police or sent to the prosecution due to the receipt of money and valuables by the victim to dismiss the victim from the head of the management office of the above apartment.

2. On September 26, 2012, around 20:0, at the meeting room of the above apartment management office, nine representatives including G, etc., ten residents, etc. in the meeting room of the council of occupants, with respect to the victim while the council of occupants' representatives was in operation, “I will not know too much,” “I will have already entered the petition in relation to the method of action,” “I would have followed different sounds from the waste management office to B,” and “I would request an audit to solve the doubt.”

arrow