Plaintiff and appellant
Plaintiff 1 and nine others (Attorney Kim Sung-ju, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)
Defendant, Appellant
The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (Law Firm Doo, Attorney Lee Dong-soo, Counsel for defendant)
Conclusion of Pleadings
December 1, 2010
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2010Guhap12378 decided June 24, 2010
Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The appeal costs are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
The decision of the first instance court is revoked, and the defendant's order is revoked to confirm that each of the plaintiffs stated in the “Plaintiff” column in the “Disposition List” column in the separate disposition list is excessive, and that each of the above plaintiffs was paid to each of the plaintiffs as to each of the above plaintiffs on the same date, and refund it to each of the winners.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning for this Court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for correcting “○○○” of each Plaintiff’s respective Plaintiff’s “○○” on the Plaintiff’s list and disposition list as “Plaintiff 2,” and therefore, this Court cited it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
[Attachment]
Judges Yellow-gu (Presiding Judge)