logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.04.18 2018고단84
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

After getting on a B-cab, the Defendant got a taxi driver and the Si expenses at the fee rate, and came to search for it with the aforementioned taxi engineer at the D District of Chuncheon Police Station D in Chuncheon-si.

After that, on December 6, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the circumstances of the instant case at the above location, and assaulted the E, etc. of the circumstances of the said global belt, where the Defendant confirmed the situation of the instant case and flapsing home, by putting the flab, keeping the flab, and photographing the face without any justifiable reason.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of global complaints.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of investigation reports, on-site photographs, and video-related Acts and subordinate statutes, such as actions, within the zone against the suspect;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is an element of sentencing unfavorable to the Defendant, inasmuch as the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, frightened and displayed the breath of the damaged police, and the nature of the crime is bad, and is not agreed with the damaged police, etc.

However, the fact that the defendant shows the appearance of recognizing and opposing the crime of this case, the defendant has no record of being sentenced to more severe punishment than suspension of qualification since 2000, and that there is no record of being punished for the same kind of crime, etc. shall be considered as factors for sentencing favorable to the defendant. In full view of all other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence shall be determined as per the disposition.

arrow