Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
피고인은 2015. 11. 23. 20:20 경 울산 남구 B에 있는 울산 남부 경찰서 C 지구대 앞 노상에서, 앞서 같은 날 19:56 경 택시요금을 지불하지 않은 일로 즉결 심판 회부된 것에 불만을 품고, “ 씨 발 놈들 아, 재밌냐.
D. D, a police officer belonging to the above district police group, recommended the Defendant to put up, speak, and return home to the district office, such as making a disturbance, flusing the police officer, and flusing the police officer into the district office, and obstructed the legitimate performance of official duties of the above D, by putting the fluss length of the above D and flusing the face into a flussent flussent flusssent flusent flusent flusent flusent flusent flusent flus, v. flussent flussent flussent flusent, and flusing him.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;
1. Selection of an alternative imprisonment with prison labor (to take account of the fact that a person repeats a crime even though he/she has been punished twice due to violence, and one time due to interference with performance of official duties);
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the confession of a crime and the appearance of a mistake, the history of punishment for
1. An order to attend a course under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;