1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. On December 24, 2014, the pertinent Plaintiff entered into a partnership agreement with the Defendant, Nonparty C, and with the content that he/she would operate a marina shop on the first floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government DD Building (hereinafter “instant partnership agreement”). Since then, the Plaintiff’s objection to the implementation of the contract was excluded from C, and the conflict between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and the Defendant, upon concluding the partnership agreement again with the Defendant.

B. On February 26, 2015, the Defendant-C’s criminal complaint against the Plaintiff (1) filed a criminal complaint with the Defendant-C against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Defendant-C”) voluntarily surrenders to the investigative agency on the fact that he/she administered the Plaintiff’s narcotics, and at the time, the Plaintiff also testified that he/she administered the phone, which led to the investigation into the Plaintiff’s suspicion of administering narcotics. On June 30, 2015, the Prosecutor of the Seoul District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a decision that the Plaintiff’s suspicion of administering the Plaintiff’s narcotics was groundless

(2) On April 2, 2015, the Defendant and C filed a complaint against the Plaintiff on the charge of fraud with the content that the Plaintiff had the Defendant enter into the instant club business agreement by deceiving the Defendant and C in a way that the Plaintiff would influorize the royalties of the said Maz site. On October 29, 2015, the public prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office decided that October 29, 2015 would also be guilty.

C. The Plaintiff’s criminal complaint against the Defendant and C filed a criminal complaint with the Defendant on the following grounds: (i) the Defendant stated that “the Plaintiff provided narcotics to others,” and (ii) sent text messages creating anxiety to the Plaintiff, according to C’s instruction; and (iii) filed a criminal complaint with the Defendant.

(2) Around March 24, 2015, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that the Plaintiff had narcotics on the job where the Plaintiff and E were located.

As to the suspicion, “a summary order (e.g., damage, fine 1,00,000 won) against the Seoul Central District Court on November 25, 2015 and summary order (e.g., damage, fine 1,00,000 won)” (ii) the suspicion that “a text message creating apprehensions to the Plaintiff was sent from March 24, 2015 to April 5, 2015,” which read that “from March 24, 2015 to April 5, 2015.”