All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. (1) In other police stations, despite the fact-finding (the part concerning the obstruction of performance of the performance of official duties by fraudulent means) other than the prosecutor (the erroneous fact-finding and unfair sentencing) of the defendant C, despite the progress of internal investigation into the charge of medication of the drug, the defendant C was at the office of the defendant C to request appraisal of the drug, and the result was reported to another police station by telephone, and the defendant C made an act of informing the other police station of the fact. The defendant C's internal investigation of the fact was notified of the result of appraisal, and the defendant C was aware of the fact of internal investigation into the defendant C through the police computer network on June 201, and there was no false notification of the administration of the drug, and the defendant C was proved to have been trained on July 19, 201 by the result of the inspection of the drug on July 19, 201, and the defendant C was found to have been aware of the credibility and credibility of the charge of the defendant C's oral administration without the defendant's statement of the facts charged.

(2) The sentence of the judgment of the court below on unreasonable sentencing (Defendant A: 1 year of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended sentence, 4 million won of fine, 10 million won of imprisonment, 10 months of suspended sentence, 2 years of suspended sentence) is too uneasible and unfair.

B. Defendant A (1) misunderstanding of facts (influence of perjury) Defendant A refers to the opinions of Defendant B and C as to whether I appears to be the same person as the multiple times, and the suspicion is doubtful, but it is not arrested for the good faith.