1. The plaintiff's appeal and the main claim expanded in the trial are dismissed, respectively.

2.The ancillary.

1. Basic facts

A. After becoming a member of the defendant who runs the banking business on February 7, 1983, the plaintiff has been working as shown in the following table 1.

On February 7, 1983, the class of the issuing position at which the class is issued on the date of the issuance of the Table No. 1, the class of the issuing position at which the class is issued is classified as the class of the vice class, the head of the team, and the team class. On April 19, 1988, class 5 of class 5 of class 5 of class 4 of class 4 of class 4 of class 4 of class 4 of class 1995 of class 3 of class 3 of class 3 of class 3 of class 3 of class 3 of class 3 of class 3 of class 3 on February 8, 2001. On November 1, 2002, 3 defendant classified the positions of employees into class No. 1 to class 5 of class 1 and class 3 of class 5 of class 1, L2, 4, and group group leader(s).

On January 9, 2007, L4408, the head of the team at the Dong-ri Branch on January 3, 2008, the team members L4 on January 30, 2008, the mobile Gu-ri Branch L4 February 1, 2008, the position of which is changed on February 1, 2008.

B. The defendant introduced a simple evaluation system on the business performance of the defendant 1, who introduced a simple evaluation system, shall annually apply the comprehensive evaluation criteria for the employees who are in the position of the main office in the existing branch office.

1. During the period from January to December 31, 12, the performance of the work is assessed by the annual evaluation method, which is the 5-level (5-point points from among those who score not less than 95% of the total number of marks), the A-class (4 points from among those who score not less than 87.5% of the total number of marks), the G class (3 points from among those who score not less than 80% of the total number of marks), the C grade (2 points from among those who score not less than 70% of the total number of marks), and the D grade (1 point from among those who score less than 70% of the total number of marks), and the following assignment has been determined by the annual evaluation method, which is the 3-year average number.

2) According to the above method, since the next letter of personnel management was held in February and March each year, there is a vacancy in business affairs in February, so the defendant's dismissal around April 7, 2006.

1.1. to November 30, 190 shall be converted into annual performance records.