The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 23, 2014, the Plaintiff received medical care by March 31, 2019 after obtaining approval from the Defendant for the “h3, L4, M2, L3, L4, and L2,” the garrising to the garrising to the garrising to the garrisingus (e.g. 6,7,8, 6,7,9,10), the garrising to the garrisingus (S5), the garrising to the garrisingus (L3, L4), the garrisingus total damage, and the garrising to the Defendant on April 2, 2019, and thereafter filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant on April 2, 2019.

B. On October 8, 2019, the Defendant rendered a decision on the Plaintiff’s disability status under class 8 class 2 of disability grade (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 5 through 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The main point of the Plaintiff’s assertion was due to the Mami-Mami-Mami, thereby showing the symptoms of the Mami-Mami-Mami, and accordingly, there was symptoms that the Plaintiff needs to wear and replace a urine because it is impossible for the Plaintiff to receive urology.

This is a person with disability grade 3) or with chilling light (50cc or below disability grade) due to the lack of the full function of the light.

In addition, the plaintiff is a person who needs to receive constant nursing from time to time due to the difficulty of normal pedestrian traffic due to the nego No. 5 of grade 2 of the disability grade (a person who has a significant obstacle to the function or mental function of the negoy system).

Nevertheless, the disposition of this case is unlawful.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

(c)

Facts of recognition

1) With respect to the claim for disability benefits, the Plaintiff’s doctor’s opinion on the rehabilitation department (as of March 30, 2019), the Plaintiff’s medical certificate of disability (as of March 30, 2019), urology, urine, and urine disorder: continuous urine insertion. The urine is a grade and urine, which are not required for ema for urine changes: the erode is limited to the Fgrade and the urine operation scope, which are not based on the evaluation of the Do water strength, but the urine, fluence, and the above disability continues, and the Plaintiff’s doctor’s opinion on the claim for disability benefits will walk independently due to the above disability condition.