logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.05.10 2018고단1133
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 2017, the Defendant listened to the statement that it is difficult to obtain a loan if he/she is absent from his/her name, who is an employee of B, who runs a loan brokerage business, and conspired with the Defendant to forge a certificate of income and submit it to the lending company as if he/she is currently working in the “C Sales” located near the Defendant’s residence.

1. Around May 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) asked the Defendant to forge his/her certificate of income to use his/her name-based phone to the above person in his/her residence; (b) on the same day, he/she consented to such request; and (c) on April 1, 2017, “Name A, Date F, Term of Office from April 1, 2017 to April 2, 2017; and (d) on the job information column, “Name C store, business registration number G, and address column”; and (c) on the job information column, the Defendant voluntarily signed his/her name by the representative, J, K, and the date of issuance” in the “name C store, business registration number G, and address column”; and (d) signed the name of the J on May 22, 2017.”

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a certificate of income under the name of J, which is a private document related to a certificate of fact, for the purpose of exercising in collusion with the above-mentioned person.

2. The Defendant, in collusion with the above-mentioned person, asked L company to submit a false income certificate at the same time and place as the above-mentioned in paragraph (1), and the above-mentioned person consented to the above-mentioned person. On the same day, the above-mentioned person sent a false income certificate by facsimile as if he was a document duly formed to the employees in charge of L loan who knew of the forgery.

3. The accused of fraud shall be an employee in charge of lending L, a victim corporation, through a statement of income confirmation forged, as described in paragraph 1, at the same time and place as described in paragraph 1.

arrow