Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 1 and 6 months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 191" - Defendant B's fraud, and Defendant A's false aiding and abetting fraud are operating a telephone financial fraud organization that receives money from victims who misrepresented to a financial institution, etc. and want to obtain money by telephone from an unspecified victim while operating a call center in China's French land.

1. Defendant B, at the end of October 2017, the Defendant received a proposal that he would bring back the amount of damage recovered if (i) he/she had the role of “collection” in return for delivering the money withdrawn from the account name, etc. from the non-member of the organization in charge of telephone financing fraud (i.e., “F”), or (ii) had the intent to bring the money collected to the place instructed by the organization members, and (iii) had the intent to bring the said money back to the amount of money recovered, and (iv) had the intent to bring the said money back to the amount of money recovered.

Since then, on November 24, 2017, a name-free person will post a telephone call with the victim G's cell phone, and make a loan to the amount of KRW 20 million with the interest rate of KRW 8.8% which is 8.8% of the OK Savings Bank.

In order to obtain a loan, existing loans must be repaid.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the above-mentioned person was not an employee of the OK Savings Bank, and there was no intention or ability to provide a loan to the victim.

Nevertheless, the above person in unsound name was accused of the victim as above and was transferred KRW 5,00,000 to A’s bank account (Account Number I) in the name of the National Bank on the same day as the previous vehicle loan, KRW 5,578,000 to the new bank account (Account Number K) in the name of J on the 27th of the same month, and KRW 3,000,000 to L’s bank account (Account Number M) on the 28th of the same month.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with the non-name assistance staff, was accused of the victim, and received a total of KRW 13,578,00 from the victim.

2. The Defendant Company A’s money from the Defendant’s late-round November 2017 to the four accounts, i.e., “work,” and the money entered into the four accounts.