logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.06.09 2016고단1832
사기방조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Incheon District Court on February 14, 201, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor on December 19, 2014, and completed the execution of the said sentence at the Gwangju Prison on July 30, 2014.

The defendant of "2016 High Order 1832" was aware that he/she was a member of the single-year and four months's imprisonment with prison labor due to transfer of a passbook to a person who was unaware of his/her name, and that he/she was willing to purchase a passbook, etc. under the name of the defendant from a person who was unaware of his/her name when he/she was asked to purchase a passbook, etc. under the name.

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall transfer or take over any access medium unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act in using or managing the access medium;

Since the Defendant’s need to make money around July 2, 2015, the Defendant came to know of the name-free head of the Tong (Kakao Stockholm) under the name-free head of the Tong to seek a passbook by searching the “purchase of the passbook” on the Internet portal site,” and would offer 300,000 won per week from the above person’s name-free head of the Tong.

“The proposal was made”.

On July 3, 2015, the Defendant transferred the passbook (Account Number: G) and cash cards connected thereto in the name of the Defendant to the non-standing party through Kwikset’s service in front of the “F” coffee shop near E No. 5, located in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

2. On July 2, 2015, the name influor of assistance in fraud to the victim H is not the employee of the OK Savings Bank, and the fact is not the employee of the OK Savings Bank, but the victim did not have the intent or ability to provide the loan to the victim H, thereby allowing the victim H to obtain the loan at a lower rate than the existing loan.

The phrase "I send money under the name of the deposit for payment" is false, and it is from the victim.

arrow