The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include: (a) the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and against himself; (b) there are family members to support; and (c) the fact that the defendant's will and his family want to leave the defendant's wife.

On the other hand, the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she was punished several times due to traffic-related crimes, such as drinking without a license, and even during the suspension of execution due to the instant crime, even though he/she was under the suspension of execution, and the Defendant was punished by a fine by driving under the influence of alcohol during the suspension of execution, and the Defendant was under the control of driving without a license twice or without a license, including the instant crime, and was under the control of

When comprehensively considering the above circumstances and the overall sentencing conditions of Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which were revealed in the records and changes of the instant case, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.