The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (one-year imprisonment) is too unreasonable as to the gist of the grounds for appeal.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include: (a) the fact that the defendant's mistake was recognized by the defendant and against himself; (b) there are family members to support the defendant; (c) the defendant's family members and his branch members seek the defendant's preference to the trial; and (d) there are clear social ties among them

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant has been sentenced several times of suspended execution and has been punished several times for the same crime, especially the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the same period even though he was sentenced to a fine on one occasion due to the unlicensed driving crime that was in the period of suspended execution, etc. is disadvantageous to the defendant.

When comprehensively taking into account the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances leading up to a crime, and circumstances after a crime, etc., the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.