The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflected against the Defendant is favorable to the Defendant.

Meanwhile, the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times due to traffic-related crimes, such as driving without a license, driving without a license, etc., was sentenced to suspended sentence due to a crime such as driving without a license, and committed repeatedly the crime of driving without license of this case on nine occasions during the suspended sentence period, and that the Defendant was subject to a fine for the crime such as driving without a license during the appellate trial during the suspended sentence period, which is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

Considering the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances after committing a crime, it is difficult to deem that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable in light of the sentencing conditions indicated in the record.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.