1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be postponed for a period of two years from the date this judgment has become final.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 27, 2013, at around 20:25, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s street sales business by force by forcing the customer who visited the street to return to the customer who visited the street store by having the victim go, by putting him/her a large amount of dump “I am fe of bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a

2. On February 27, 2013, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender in relation to the crime of interference with business to the E Zone F, etc., called out after receiving 112 reports from the front of the above C, on February 27, 2013, and led to the said E zone.

At around 20:45 minutes of the same day, the Defendant continued to f, etc., who had taken a bath to the above F, etc. in the course of dealing with the instant case in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul E District, and notified the above F, “I would be able to give him/her achum with a dynamic image,” and used the hump of the said F by taking the humf into account the humf in a camr, and assaulted the face of the said F at one time by taking the humf.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of police reports and investigation of flagrant offenders.

3. Defluence;

A. On February 27, 2013, at around 20:47, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim I by saying, “I, without any justifiable reason, that is a civil petitioner H, who was receiving confirmation of traffic accident in the E-district, the Defendant at the time of civil petition consultation, saying, “I, without any justifiable reason, that I would like to say, “I am, Chewing, nice, nife, niff, nife, niff, fomb, and bitch bitch.”

B. Around 20:55 on February 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) without any justifiable reason, to a civil petitioner H, who caused the confirmation of traffic accident in the E-district, and a civil petition counsel and a police officer belonging to the E- Zone, who was working for the said E- Zone while serving in the situation.