1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 16, 2002, the Plaintiff entered the Army and served as Staff sergeant on November 30, 2002. On June 18, 2007, the Plaintiff filed an application for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant on the ground that the Plaintiff was diagnosed with “a jubreging condition (TFCC), 4-5 summary, and 5 summary-1,00 nuclear escape symptoms, satisfaction instability on the left and right side, secte, high wave fever on the right side, right side spawre, and spagal spagymosis” on the ground that the Plaintiff was diagnosed with several accidents that occurred during the performance of official duties in the military.

B. On January 15, 2008, the Defendant: (a) acknowledged that the part of “the state of ex-post ex-post in the emulgical complex of trimulgical boms, emulgical emulgs, both sides and anti-autical emulgical emulgical emulgics, both of which are unknown; (b) The part of “the emulgal emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgic emulgal

C. On March 23, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-registration of the person of distinguished service to the Defendant for the purpose that he/she would be recognized as a person of distinguished service to the Defendant as a person of distinguished service. However, on January 4, 2011, after deliberation by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, the Defendant rendered a decision corresponding to the disposition of distinguished service to the State (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Defendant did not recognize the occurrence of a special official duty of military service as a person of distinguished service on the ground that: (a) the ex post facto condition of the multi-brug-blag-brug complex blaging in the lue type of hands-out, scare, kne, kne, knee, each side of whom is well known; (b) the identification of the details of each of the instant injury; and (c) the instant injury cannot be recognized as an official duty

[Grounds for recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 9 (hereinafter, including all branches numbers, if they are not specifically identified) and the purport of the whole pleadings.