1. On January 4, 201, the Defendant rendered a decision against the Plaintiff on January 4, 201 to meet the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State.

1. Details of the disposition;

가. 원고는 2002. 8. 16. 육군에 입대하여 2002. 11. 30. 하사로 임관하여 복무하던 중 2006. 9. 20.부터 2006. 9. 27.까지 실시된 대대전술훈련평가에서 2006. 9. 24. 0:30경 백마산 사이리 일대에서 총구가 원고의 발등을 찧어 산 아래로 굴러 떨어지는 사고(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라 한다)로 ‘삼각섬유연골 술후 상태, 제4-5요추간 및 제5요추-제1천추간 수핵 탈출증, 우측 족관절 불안정성, 기면병, 고막파열, 우측 슬관절 내장증’ 진단을 받았다고 하면서, 2007. 6. 18. 피고에게 국가유공자등록신청을 하였다.

B. In each of the above wounds, the Plaintiff recognized the parts of “the state of ex post facto emulgion of the emulgion of the emulgical emulgion, both emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal emulgal

C. On March 23, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-registration of the person of distinguished service to the Defendant to the effect that it would be recognized as a person of distinguished service to the Defendant as a person of distinguished service. However, on January 4, 2011, the Defendant rendered a decision corresponding to the disposition of distinguished service to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff cannot be recognized as a person of distinguished service to the Defendant as a person of distinguished service, on the grounds that, following the deliberation of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, the Plaintiff could not be recognized as a person of distinguished service to the Plaintiff on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s condition of the multi-brupted kne, gne, kne, kne, kne, kne, kne, and knene in the form of “consium, kne, and kne in the form of occupational injury.”

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 7, Eul evidence 1 to 12 (including each number), and arguments.