1. The Defendant’s decision that rendered against the Plaintiff on December 27, 2011, which was non-conforming to the requirements of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State, has a noise level.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 1, 2003, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on July 31, 2010, as the so-called “The Army” and was discharged from military service on the part of Captain.

B. On June 30, 2011, the Plaintiff, as a result of military service, sustained the difference in the Plaintiff’s military service by adding up the following grounds: “Alley infection and unstableness after a sloping wound on the left side, both satisfaction and chronic instability, collision with the front side, the left side collision with the streke-gun, the left side collision with the annual installments, the middle streke-gun, the upper right side streke-gun, the double streke-gun, the right side strekele, the upper side streke, the upper side strekera, the streak-streak and streak (hereinafter “the instant streak”), the 6-7 side signboard escape, the 4-5 side signboard escape certificate (hereinafter “the streak, streak-gu”), and the two side noise noise pans (hereinafter “the instant Cheongak-gu”). The Plaintiff suffered the difference in the application for registration.”

C. On December 27, 2011, the Defendant rendered a decision on the Plaintiff’s non-conformity of the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State (hereinafter “instant disposition”) for the following reasons.

① Injury in the instant case: Each data differs from the time of injury and the developments leading up to the injury, and there is no confirmation of proximate causal relation between the occurrence or aggravation of the pertinent disease and the official duty because the medical record was not confirmed at the time of the award as an overseas resident officer living outside the barracks capable of commuting to and from work. ② In light of the fact that the medical record was not confirmed at the time of the award as an overseas resident officer capable of commuting to and from work, it is impossible to grasp the exact situation of the pertinent disease; otherwise, the identity of the official duty is not verified; and in view of the fact that the disease was judged as the active disease; and that the proximate causal relation was not confirmed between the outbreak or aggravation of the pertinent disease and the official duty without an operation treatment, it appears that there was a little difference between the outbreak or aggravation of the disease and the official duty.