A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 25, 2015, at around 03:00, the Defendant: (a) expressed a desire to look at the details and personal details of the instant case E during the course of the police box called up after receiving a report from 112, on the ground that the Defendant was able to drive the trial expenses for threateningly by another person; and (b) expressed a desire to “the Defendant,” and (c) expressed an desire to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the assault case, and thereby interfere with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the arrest of the flagrant offender, by assaulting the Defendant at one time the left-hand buck and the part of the buck and the part of the buck.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F, G, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each internal report, each photograph, and a copy of a work log;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that there is no basic area (6-6 months to one year and four months), the basic area (6-1 year and four months) [Pronouncement of sentence] [decision of sentence] is contrary to the suspended sentence, and the degree of assault is relatively minor, etc., to postpone the execution of imprisonment