Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 03:55 on October 03, 2013, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports in front of the Busan Eastdong-gu C Elementary School located in B, Busan; and (b) ranced him to return home on the ground that he would not be disturbed by E, the circumstances belonging to the D District Unit of the East Police Station D, and the police officer called “Isk to talk in the field of camping, chron, and Isk to the police in order to talk in the field of camping, chron, and Isns,” which read “Isk to talk in the field of camping, chron, chron, chron, chron, chron.”

The police officer issued a warning that she would have returned home after she could be punished as a crime of insult. However, the police officer continued to have avoided the disturbance for about 10 minutes while she wanted to “Cchch fch fch fch fch fch,” and continued to have avoided the disturbance for about 10 minutes. While she was able to get off the felet that she was suffering from her two arms and carried off, she got off the her body, and she was called “the principle of no taxation and taxation,” while she was called as “the principle of no taxation and taxation,” the police officer sent back her body to her face, and returned her body to her face one time as a drinking, while she resisted the defect that she tried to arrest a flagrant offender with obstruction of performance of his/her duties, and continuously engaged in violence, such as kneeking to feln with his/her fel.

After the witness E, the defendant had a drinking, and the inside border worn by E was removed from the ground floor of the victim, thereby damaging the property amounting to KRW 140,000 in the market value, and the head of the left shoulder rank was reduced by putting up the work uniform of E in the situation of the replacement.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by the police officer E and patrolmen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of a photograph and estimate related to the obstruction of performance of official duties to A;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing performance of official duties) of the corresponding Articles of the Criminal Act;

1. The Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act.