logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.23 2018고정1146
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 High Doz. 1146"

1. On December 12, 2018, at around 02:50 on December 12, 2018, the Defendant obstructed restaurant business for about 30 minutes, such as “Seaks, openings, and down death,” while drinking alone and drinking alone, the Defendant heard the horses that she would cause a disturbance from the victim D (L) who is the owner of the above restaurant business, while drinking alone.

2. The Defendant received food of KRW 9,00,00, such as one net country, 1 bottled, etc., ordered at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and received the food of KRW 9,00, and subsequently exempted the Defendant from paying the money.

"2018 High 1147"

1. Around 01:00 on March 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) believed that he/she would not have any intent or ability to pay food costs within a “F restaurant” in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) provided that he/she would be able to receive food charges from the victim G (hereinafter referred to as an employee) who is an employee; and (c) ordered spawn and spathing so that he/she would be able to receive food charges; and (d) did not pay the amount equivalent to 39,00

2. On March 21, 2018, around 16:30 on March 21, 2018, the Defendant believed that he/she would be able to receive the fare even if he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the liquor value to the injured party in the “I” restaurant located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, and acquired property benefits equivalent to the same amount by removing the amount equivalent to 11,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 High Doz. 1146"

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with D "2018 High Court 1147 High Court";

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Investigation report (verification of suspect's belongings);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of G and J

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.

arrow