logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.06.21 2016누82500
감사사임수리처분무효확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including costs incurred by participation in the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, is amended as follows 2. Even when considering the Plaintiff’s assertion in the court of first instance (which is not significantly different from the Plaintiff’s assertion in the court of first instance), the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the statement in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding a judgment that is justifiable, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of

2. On the right side of the revised 2 pages 2, 12 “Myde” was revised to “09:30 times”, “The Intervenor sent a text message to the union members along with a letter of resignation and a notice received from the Plaintiff 11:50 on the same day and sent the Plaintiff’s resignation as a file, and the revised 3 pages 8 to “No. 9” in the revised 3 pages 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 1, 1, 1, 2,” followed: “The Plaintiff submitted a letter of resignation and a notice at least 09:30 days before the same day, or late, 11:50 days before the same day, on which the Intervenor sent a text message to the Plaintiff’s auditor’s resignation.”

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are dismissed as they are without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow