logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.07.12 2016누71074
관세부과처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, is to revise the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows 2. The reasoning of the judgment is to be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, inasmuch as it is not sufficient to recognize that there is a reasonable ground to suspect that the import declaration price of the Plaintiff’s goods of this case was not the price actually paid, only the evidence submitted by the Defendant and the evidence submitted by this court (Evidence No.

2. Of the 2 pages 7 of the amended part “(hereinafter referred to as “”)” in the 7 pages 2 “(hereinafter referred to as “(s)”)” in the 6th page 18 “A” in the 6th column 19 of the 6th column 19 of the addition “A” in the 6th column 6th page 19 of the addition “A”, “A large part” in the 7th column 6th page 7 of the last 6 column 7. The addition “A large part” is difficult to read “a large part”.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified and acceptable.

The judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow