Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 High 1328] Defendant is a person who operates food stores at a D parking lot located in Pakistan in Pakistan.

On May 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 11:40 on May 4, 2015, the Defendant, at the above parking lot, talked with F, a dispute with F, and a trial cost because F, who is the seat of the victim E (58 tax), talks with the Defendant to seek an understanding in order to put up for a great deal of Saturdays in the above parking lot.

The Defendant is the victim of this case and “Isson?”

As the floor of the victim, “the victim was laid down once,” the victim’s chest was inflicted on the victim by raising the victim’s slick, and the victim was slicked for about 30 days on three occasions with the slick floor of the victim, which requires treatment.

[2015 Highly 1329] The Defendant is a person who operates a street shop, and maintains a livelihood by selling coffee, tea ( drinks), military night, military cata, etc.

Any person who intends to install any facility, building or structure other than facilities necessary for the creation of greenbelts pursuant to the Act on Urban Parks, Greenbelts, etc. shall obtain permission for the occupation and use of the competent authority managing the greenbelt.

Nevertheless, without obtaining permission to occupy and use, the Defendant occupied and used a green area without permission by installing a street store with a floor size of about 15 square meters equipped with facilities necessary for selling coffee, tea ( drinks), military night, and military golf clubs (a tent, etc.) against many unspecified customers who passed the place in the park owned by the Korea Rural Community Corporation from February 6, 2013 to September 2015.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 High Court Decision 1328]

1. Entry of a defendant in part in the protocol of second public trial;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Part concerning the cross-examination of the suspect against the defendant in the prosecutor's office

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Stopy photographs (the defendant and his defense counsel denies the facts charged;

However, E and F are consistent in police, prosecutor's office, and this court and are consistent with the facts charged in detail.