logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.11.11 2015고단4753
사기등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months;

However, this judgment has become final and conclusive against Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below] Defendant A is the owner of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I Apartment 110 dong 1205 (hereinafter this case apartment) and Defendant B and Defendant C are the husband and wife.

Defendant

B, Defendant C became aware of the loan hub, including the ‘K', while he was aware of the loan source via the Internet, and as if he was the lessee of the apartment building in this case owned by J, Defendant C intended to obtain a loan by means of a false lease deposit as security.

On the other hand, Defendant A also knew of the loan source through the Internet, and agreed to obtain a false lease deposit for the apartment in this case as a collateral, and provided J's identification card to be used for verifying the status of the lessor when preparing a false lease contract for the apartment in this case. On the other hand, Defendant B and Defendant C, the most lessee when the loan employee verified the lease of the apartment in this case, and conspired to have the above loan divided.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendants’ joint principal conduct: (a) the daily wage for the fraud lending hub : (b) the victim’s modernization marine insurance as described in paragraph (2) submitted a forged lease contract under the JJ’s name; and (c) applied for a loan of KRW 280,000,000 as security for the false lease deposit for the apartment in this case.

Defendant

B around August 8, 2014, at a coffee shop located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, concluded that the staff in charge of the victims' modernized marine insurance leased the apartment house to KRW 2.80,000,000, and accordingly, the staffO of the N Co., Ltd confirmed whether Defendant B and Defendant C actually resided in the apartment house.

Accordingly, Defendant B shall contact Defendant A through a daily allowance of loan broker, and Defendant A shall inform the above loan broker daily members of the password and take out the family members who were in his house, and the above loan brok daily day shall be prior to the inspection of the apartment of this case by the above O.

arrow