A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Larceny;

A. On April 15, 2017, around 21:55, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim B, who was passing ahead of the “D” located in Pakistan, and was stolen by means of having a 20,000 won of the market price displayed earlier by the victim B, and having a son’s son worth KRW 20,000.

B. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim E, while passing ahead of “G” located in “G” in “G” in “G” in the Pariju-si, Pariju on May 2017, the Defendant stolen it by having a 15,000 won of the market price displayed in front of the Pari-si, and having a 1 minute of the printing seal owned by the victim E.

(c)

On June 2, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime against the Victim H, while passing ahead of the “J” located in the Republic of Korea (J), around 22:20 on June 2, 2017, the Defendant stolen the Defendant by having two parts of the victim H, which amount to the total market value of KRW 6,000,000, displayed in front of the Defendant.

2. On April 15, 2017, around 22:10, the Defendant: (a) went in front of L’s “M” used by the Victim K as a public book room and residence; (b) intruded into Mas through the heat gate; and (c) took one part of the inner fireworks owned by the victim and stolen it in excess of KRW 8,000 at the market price of 8,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to K and E;

1. Each statement of B and H;

1. Application of each protocol of seizure and each statute of the list of seizure;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment (abstinence, choice of imprisonment), and Article 330 of the Criminal Act (abstinence at night);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant has been punished as a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same crime in 2013.

Nevertheless, each of the crimes of this case was committed.

However, the defendant is against the defendant, and the victims do not want to punish the defendant.

The amount of damage is the small amount.

otherwise, the age of the defendant;