logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.21 2017고단5645
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won per day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 01:20 on August 5, 2017, in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant was urged to return home from D and D, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Yak Police Station C, a police officer assigned to the site after receiving a report from 112 that drunk female would enjoy on the road, and the police officer was able to leave home from D and D, a police officer assigned to the front seat of the police officer assigned to the site. While the police officer was moving the Defendant to the front seat of the patrol police officer, the police officer was able to leave the Defendant on the back seat of the Defendant’s bridge, and the police officer said D, “I will not come to go to the Defendant’s bridge.”

The bitch bitch fch farch farch farch farch farbar farb. The barbar farbar farbar far farbar far farbar far D, and the bar har far farbbar far farbbar far farbbar far E, and the bar far bar far far far E, which

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the standing photographs and photographs of victimized police officers, cosmetic containers used for crime, and diagnostic documents;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (the punishment imposed on a person who interferes with the performance of official duties against E with more severe crime quality);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment is a matter of obstructing police officers from exercising their lawful exercise of force against police officers who tried to safely return to their home on the street while under the influence of alcohol at night, and thus, there is no need to impose a heavy sentence on the defendant, as it is not good that the nature and circumstances of the crime are good.

arrow