1. The Defendant refers to the Plaintiffs’ “amount of consolation money claimed by each Plaintiff and the amount of consolation money” in attached Form 2.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The investigation process against the instant principal, etc. 1) Plaintiff A and the deceased B (hereinafter “case principal”).

(2) On November 18, 1969, the principal of the case was investigated into North Korea on June 1969, and returned to Incheon on November 2, 1969, and was transferred to Seocheon Police Station investigators on November 5, 1969. Since the warrant of detention was issued on November 11, 1969 and was executed around that time, the principal of the case was investigated under illegal confinement for about six (6) days before the execution of the warrant of detention. The principal of the case was investigated under the above illegal confinement, Guta, and adviser on November 18, 1969. The principal of the case was led to the confession and escape under the control of the anti-government organization, including the crime of violation of the Fisheries Act, and led to the confession and escape under the control of the prosecutor's office (the crime of escape under the control of the anti-government organization).

B. On April 7, 1970, the Daejeon District Court found the Defendant guilty of the violation of public law and the violation of the Fisheries Act due to escape among the facts charged, and sentenced the Defendant to one year imprisonment, suspension of qualification for one year, suspension of execution for imprisonment, and two years of suspended execution for imprisonment, and sentenced the Defendant not guilty of each violation of public law and general interest due to the receipt of money and other valuables ( Daejeon District Court Branch Decision 69Da3089). The Prosecutor appealed against the above judgment, but the appeal was dismissed on September 9, 1970 (Seoul High Court Decision 70No296) and the above judgment became final and conclusive on September 17, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as “the judgment subject to review”).

2) The principal of this case is the principal of this case.