beta
Text
1. The defendant attached Form to the plaintiffs
2. The “amount of discount” stated in the damages statement shall be the corresponding amount and the corresponding amount.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. (1) The plaintiffs A, H, and the networkO were sent back to North Korea on June 11, 1969, and returned to Korea during fishing operations. (2) The plaintiffs are specifically related to the two North Koreas themselves or their families as above.
2. The phrase “Classification” in the damages list is as the same.
B. The grounds for final conviction due to the violation of public law are as follows: 1) Plaintiff A, H, and the networkO, etc. (hereinafter “the instant North Korea fishing division”).
Around June 11, 1969, North Korea returned to the Republic of Korea on November 2, 1969.2) The North Korea’s Republic of Korea was prosecuted as follows: violation of the Fisheries Act, violation of the Antipublic law, and violation of the general immigration law.
① Violation of the Fisheries Act or violation of the anti-public law due to escape: around 18:00 on June 11, 1969: (3) At the sea of the 37.38 degrees 45 degrees east 125 degrees east 125 degrees east 37.35 degrees east 125 degrees east 37.35 degrees east east 125.10 degrees east east east 125.2 escape to an area under the control of North leader, which is an anti-public law due to receipt of money and valuables; (2) escape to an area under the control of an anti-government organization; (3) return money and valuables from members of North leader with the knowledge of the fact that he/she would benefit from locking and escape; (3) At the expense of the Republic of Korea, he/she inform the members of North leader of the location of the portrait; and harming the military interest of the Republic of Korea; and (4) the details of the judgment of the court as follows:
Defendant
The judgment of the court of first instance on April 7, 1970, 69Da3089 decided April 7, 1970, and the judgment of the period of detention on the date of release as the Seoul High Court Decision 70No296 decided September 9, 1970, was convicted of violation of the law of violation of the escape and escape of law, 312 days after the suspension of qualification for 1 year and 6 months of imprisonment for a maximum of 1 year and 1 year and 6 months of suspension of qualification for 1 year and 1 year and 6 months of suspension of qualification for 1 year and 3 months of suspension of qualification for 1 year and 6 months.