logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.12.30 2015고단1605
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above penalties shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B on January 2, 2012, the Gwangju District Court has received a summary order of a fine of five million won due to the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. in the application of the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts.

Defendant

B is a person who operates an entertainment drinking house with the trade name “EM” in Jeonnam-si, and Defendant A is a spouse of Defendant B and is a person who actually participates in the operation and sales management of the said entertainment drinking house with the position of “EM”.

The Defendants employed entertainment workers and paid service charges, etc. to entertainment workers, including the consideration for sexual traffic, and F was willing to engage in the business of arranging sexual traffic by negotiating the consideration, etc. for sexual intercourse with customers who wish to engage in sexual intercourse, and introducing female entertainment workers who engage in sexual intercourse.

F around July 28, 2014, the said G was allowed to provide entertainment services, such as having a person G (tentatively named “H”) employed under the premise of Defendant B’s “Secondary” as a guest I and each partner, and provided entertainment services. Under the condition that the said G would receive two million won upon receiving the said I’s “Secondary” request, the F had the said G move along with the said I to the Jel, which was connected with the said main shop, and arranged sexual traffic on 47 occasions from July 28, 2014 to December 31 of the same year, as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement by each prosecutor's office to K;

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol of I and L to each police interrogation protocol;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Consideration, such as the fact that it reflects the wrongs in depth, that the price for arranging sexual traffic is all acquired by the women engaged in sexual traffic, and that the defendants did not acquire it, and that the defendants A

1. An inspection of collection:

arrow