1. The Defendant’s KRW 516,558,780 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from September 8, 2017 to October 18, 2019.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) C is a D-Blue car on September 8, 2017 (hereinafter “Defendant”) around 23:25, 2017.

) While driving a vehicle and driving a vehicle in the direction of the Fhigh School in the direction of the Fhigh School along the three-lane road of the front direction of the E-lane, the Plaintiff, who walked to the right side of the crosswalk on the left side of the front side of the Defendant vehicle, was shocked to the front part of the front part of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “instant traffic accident”).

2) The Plaintiff sustained the injury of the lower part of the lower part due to the instant traffic accident, i.e., the Plaintiff sustained the injury of the lower part due to the injury of the water.

3) The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract against the Defendant vehicle. The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with the Defendant vehicle. The fact that there is no dispute about the ground for recognition, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 3 (including serial numbers; hereinafter the same

each entry or video, the whole purport of the pleading;

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident as the insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring any special circumstance, since the Plaintiff was injured by the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle.

C. The limitation of liability, however, according to the above evidence and the video of Eul evidence No. 8, the plaintiff was erroneous in crossing the road at the 8th line crosswalk (the remaining time signal, etc. has been installed) at the late night, without examining the surrounding areas even though the pedestrian signal was changed to red signal, and considering the background of the accident in this case and all the circumstances before and after the accident in this case, the plaintiff's mistake also caused the occurrence or expansion of damages. Thus, the defendant's liability is limited to 70% by taking this into account in calculating the amount of damages that the defendant should compensate for.

2. The attached amount of damages, except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages.