1. The Defendant’s KRW 76,392,385 as well as 5% per annum from July 17, 2013 to August 23, 2019 to the Plaintiff.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. At around 00:50 on July 17, 2013, C: (a) DK3 Passenger Vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicles”)

2) The Plaintiff, while driving a vehicle, she was able to drive the instant accident scene, was shocked by the Plaintiff, who immediately crossed the crosswalk in the front direction direction from the front side of the other vehicle, which was parked from the front side of the opposite direction to the right side in the direction of the road while he was straighted in one lane of the two lanes from the front side of the string direction to the string of the two lanes on the top of the string direction as follows. The Plaintiff, while turning back to the public with the said shock, has come to conflict one more on the top side of the left side of the other vehicle, which was parked from the opposite direction to the signal signal from the opposite direction to the air (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”).

(2) Due to the instant traffic accident, the Plaintiff sustained injury, such as cutting the aggregate of the following strings, galkes, and galkes, cutting the aggregate of the strings, salkes, and salkes, cutting the right stalkes, cutting the upper stalkes, cutting the stalkes of the left stalkes, etc.

F GHI 3) The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract against the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with the Defendant. The fact that there is no dispute, and evidence Nos. 3 and 4 (if available, including the number; hereinafter

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident as the insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring any special circumstance, since the Plaintiff was injured by the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle.

C. Limit of liability, however, in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings (including medical records submitted by the head of the J Hospital in accordance with the order to submit documents) in each statement of the evidence No. 3, it is recognized that at the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff, at the time of the instant accident, crossed off without permission in violation of pedestrian signal on the crosswalk with signal apparatus at the night, while drinking. The driver of the Defendant vehicle is the driver of the Defendant vehicle.