logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2016.12.16 2015누4083
국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The first instance court dismissed the part of the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant pertaining to the determination of non-conformity of the person who rendered distinguished service to the State, and cited the part of the determination of non-conformity of the person who received distinguished service to the State, and appealed only against the Defendant. As such, the scope of the court’s adjudication is limited to the part against which the Defendant lost, and thus

2. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim to revoke the plaintiff's claim for revocation of the plaintiff's non-eligible for veteran's compensation is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow