1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The first instance court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant for revocation of a non-conformity of the requirements for a person eligible for veteran’s compensation, and accepted the part of the claim for revocation of a non-conformity of the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State, and appealed only against the Defendant. As such, the scope of the court’s adjudication is limited to the part of the Defendant’s claim for revocation of the non

2. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal or addition of some contents as follows. Thus, this case is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 6th 10th 10th 10th 10th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 2

The "videos of evidence No. 15" shall be added to the ground for recognition of Part 6 20 of the judgment of the first instance.

The second sentence of the first instance court's second sentence "Fe. 10, 2014" is "Fe. 10, 2014," and the third sentence "Fe. 3, 2014" is "Fe. 3, 2014," respectively.

"The results of fact inquiry conducted on January 20, 2016 at the time of the first instance court's 7th instance court's 3rd instance judgment" added "the results of fact inquiry conducted on January 20, 2016 to the 55th higher court's Army."

The Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State") shall be added to the seventh

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim for revocation of the non-qualified decision of the person who rendered distinguished services to the State of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.