1. Of the instant primary claim and the instant conjunctive claim, the case indicated in the [Attachment 1 and 2] list was forwarded.

1. Details of disposition;

A. On July 7, 2015, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to disclose each information listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 (hereinafter “instant information”).

B. On July 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) sent the information subject to disclosure request to the Plaintiff on the original investigation documents; and (b) did not hold the information by sending it to the Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office’ Office.

(existence of Information) made a non-disclosure decision on the ground that the decision was not made.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

The Plaintiff filed an objection, which is subject to “the copy of the original copy, not the request,” and claimed that the subject of the request for disclosure is subject to “a copy of the pocket book or any other information on business prepared by the police officer,” and that “the Plaintiff-related records stored in the police officer’s computer for business purposes.”

On August 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) Article 9(1)4 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”); and (b) Article 9(1)6 of the Information Disclosure Act (name, resident registration number, and other personal information included in the pertinent information that could infringe on an individual’s privacy or freedom if disclosed); (c) Article 9(1)4 of the same Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”); and (d) Article 9(1)6 of the same Act (“Information Disclosure Act”) dismissed an objection on the ground that the original investigation record is sent to the Prosecutor’s Office for non-existence.

E. On August 12, 2015, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to clarify clearly the specification and non-existence of non-existence information.

Accordingly, the defendant, on August 19, 2015, revealed that the grounds for non-disclosure are stated in the “reasons for non-disclosure” column of attached Table 1, and information Nos. 2 and 5 listed in attached Table 1 does not exceed the Act on Promotion of the Digitalization of Criminal Justice Process.