logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2020.01.08 2018가단106827
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Compensation for damage caused by an accident in the attached Form No. 1 to the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) against the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff).

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement with the DRano 4.5 tons of oil voltage, owned by C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s Crecil”).

B. E, around 09:00 on March 10, 2014, around 09:0, at G factories located in the Asia-si F Complex, left the board while walking the Plaintiff’s Crestt on the Plaintiff’s Crestt.

E. At the same time, the Defendant was faced with the factory Dong and the Plaintiff’s cirs in order to perform electrical line work necessary to install air pipelines on the second floor of the factory at the above site. However, the Defendant was faced with an accident where the Defendant’s head, shoulder, etc. was shocked by the lower panel as above (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. The Defendant sustained an injury, such as a scarcity and chest scarcity, due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Class A, Nos. 1, 3, 5, and Nos. 1 through 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the main claim

A. The following circumstances, which can be seen by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments of each evidence before the occurrence of the liability for damages, i.e., ① install a safety pen so that other workers do not enter the board within the radius of work before moving the board by using the plaintiff's cranes, and post a safety manager at the site and take measures to prohibit them from approaching the board within the radius of work. However, E does not take measures to prohibit such access. ② In addition, E must carry out work after fixing the board on the part of the string of the strings so that the strings do not fall from the board in the course of moving the strings. However, in light of the fact that E merely carried out work with two parts of the strings under both sides of the strings while moving the strings, the accident of this case is driven by the plaintiff.

arrow