logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018. 01. 11. 선고 2017누71590 판결
약정일 이전의 주식매수선택권 행사분에 대한 보전액이 손금에 산입되어야 하는지 여부[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court-2016-Gu Partnership-69437 ( August 25, 2017)

Title

Whether the amount to be compensated for the exercise of stock option before the date of the agreement shall be included in deductible expenses.

Summary

Stock-based compensation costs fall under personnel expenses and must be included in deductible expenses, and the requirements of Article 19 subparagraph 19 of the Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Act are also satisfied.

Related statutes

Article 19 subparag. 19 of the Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Act; Article 19 subparag. 3 of the Enforcement Decree

Cases

2017Nu71590 Revocation of revocation of revocation of correction

Plaintiff

○○○○○○○○ Bank

Defendant

○ Head of tax office

Conclusion of Pleadings

December 14, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

January 11, 2018

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The defendant's rejection of correction of corporate tax of 0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 for the business year of 2011, and 0,000,000,000,000 for the business year of 2012 shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of the judgment of the court is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the

2. Conclusion

Since the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is groundless.

arrow