logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014. 12. 03. 선고 2014누55016 판결
조세혜택의 중복지원 여부는 사업장을 기준으로 판단하여 동일 과세연도 내에서도 각 사업장을 구분경리하였다면 세액감면과 세액공제 동시적용 가능[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2013Guhap57679 ( October 29, 2014)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seoul High Court Decision 2013Heo081 (Law No. 16, 2013)

Title

Whether to provide double support for tax benefits may be applied simultaneously with tax reduction or exemption if each place of business is kept separately within the same taxable year based on the criteria of the place of business.

Summary

(1) In light of the purport of each provision of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act, whether a tax benefit is duplicate support shall be determined not by a national or a resident but by a place of business. Therefore, if each place of business is kept separately within the same taxable business year, tax reduction and tax credit may be applied simultaneously.

Related statutes

Article 127 (Elimination of Overlapping Assistance) of the former Restriction of Special Taxation Act

Cases

2014Nu55016 Revocation of Disposition of Corporate Tax Imposition

Plaintiff

O Co., Ltd.

Defendant

OO Head of the tax office

Conclusion of Pleadings

oly 22, 2014

Imposition of Judgment

December 03, 2014

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The corporate tax for the business year of 2007 that the defendant against the plaintiff on May 16, 2012

Each disposition of KRW 0,00,000,000 (including additional tax of KRW 000,000,000), the corporate tax of KRW 0,000,000,000 for the business year 2008, and the corporate tax of KRW 0,000,000,000 for the business year 2009, and the corporate tax of KRW 0,000,000 for the business year 2010 shall be revoked.

Reasons

The reasoning of this court's judgment is the same as that of the first instance court. Thus, it is accepted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow