logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.08.25 2015가단249713
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 43,310,420 as well as 5% per annum from August 3, 2015 to August 25, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Establishment of liability for damages;

A. The establishment of liability: (a) was negligent in neglecting the duty of care during the course of bypassing the crosswalks by using two lanes in New Elementary Schools from the boundary of the official university in the official university in the official university in the official university in the official university in the 98th of August, 3, 2015, at the 02:30th of August, 3, 2015, in which the Plaintiff had turned the crosswalks to the right right from the left side of the vehicle in the front of the official university in the official university in the front of the 98th century, and due to the negligence of neglecting the duty of care; (b) at the time, the Plaintiff could not be held liable for damages to the Plaintiff’s vehicle in the front of the vehicle in the front of the two-lanes; and (c) the Plaintiff could not be held liable for damages to the Plaintiff’s oral argument and the foregoing vehicle’s total number of damages to the right side (hereinafter the same shall apply); and (d) the Defendant may not be held liable for damages to the Plaintiff’s comprehensive vehicle number No. 2.

B. Meanwhile, according to the aforementioned evidence, the Plaintiff’s negligence can be found as to whether the front and rear left of the crosswalk is without a vehicle, and even if it is necessary to build the crosswalk safely. Such circumstance also appears to have contributed to the occurrence and expansion of damages caused by the instant accident. Thus, the Defendant’s liability should be limited to the extent of 90% in determining the amount of damages to be compensated by the Defendant.

2. The following facts are acknowledged in full view of the aforementioned evidence: Gap evidence Nos. 3, 5, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3; and the result of the court’s physical examination of the Seoul Hospital at the Macheon-do University.

arrow