beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share the Plaintiff’s KRW 20,04,797, and KRW 57,271,301, and each of the said money to the Plaintiff A.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Facts of recognition 1) Defendant D’s vehicle for the E-city bus (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 19:45 October 14, 2015
2) The portion of the plaintiffs' issuance of a crosswalkd in violation of pedestrian signal while driving a vehicle and making a left turn along the two-lanes at the intersection of the road in the direction of Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant accident”) was shocked with the front and front wheels of the defendant vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).
2) Due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff A suffered respectively the injury, such as cutting the body of the bones, cutting the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the Plaintiff
3) Defendant C Federation (hereinafter “Defendant C Federation”)
(i) is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant vehicle. 【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, A’s evidence Nos. 1, 9, 10, and B’s evidence Nos. 1 and 3 (including paper numbers), and the purport of the entire pleadings.
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, Defendant D is the driver of the Defendant vehicle, barring any special circumstance, and Defendant D is jointly liable to compensate the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident as the mutual aid business operator of the Defendant vehicle.
C. Restrictions on liability, however, the plaintiffs also violated pedestrian signal and did not pay attention to the occurrence of the accident of this case and the expansion of damages caused by these errors. As such, since the plaintiffs contributed to the occurrence of the accident of this case and the expansion of damages, it shall be considered in calculating the amount of damages to be compensated by the defendant, but the pedestrian signal was changed to red, and thereafter, the accident of this case occurred.