1. The Defendant’s KRW 907,925,545 as well as 5% per annum from May 12, 2015 to September 5, 2019 to the Plaintiff.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) On May 12, 2015, C is a D-si vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 02:16 on May 12, 2015.

) While driving the Plaintiff, while driving a two-lane of the front two-lanes in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, the Plaintiff, who dried the crosswalk on the pedestrian color signal, was shocked in front of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) As a result of the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, such as blood flag, external cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Spa, less than e

3) The defendant is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a mutual aid agreement with the defendant's vehicle. 【Ground for recognition's absence of dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 2 through 4, 8, 9, Eul's evidence No. 6 (each of the descriptions or images, including paper numbers, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the plaintiff sustained an injury due to the operation of the defendant vehicle, barring special circumstances, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages caused by the accident in this case as the mutual aid business operator of the defendant vehicle.

C. The limitation of liability, however, the plaintiff, as the plaintiff, must cross the crosswalk in compliance with the signal, and as at the time of the accident, it is highly likely that the driver of the vehicle driving on the crosswalk might obstruct the view of the driver of the vehicle driving on the road by getting off the crosswalk at night. Therefore, despite the fact that the driver of the vehicle driving on the crosswalk, as a pedestrian, has to unfold the road by taking into account the surrounding circumstances well, the plaintiff, as a pedestrian, failed to take into account the surrounding vehicle condition without looking at the direction of the vision, and has contributed to the occurrence of the accident of this case and the expansion of damages, so the plaintiff's error contributed to the expansion of the occurrence of the accident of this case, it shall be considered in calculating the amount of damages to be compensated by the defendant, but it shall also be considered in consideration of the fact that the driver of the defendant vehicle did not drive the vehicle under the speed.